Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Michigan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 00:43, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Michigan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BASIC. No significant coverage from reliable sources known for editorial oversight or accuracy. Articles posted on "Global Buzz Live"[1], "Focusa2z"[2], :"Alternative Media Forum"[3], and "General Knowledge News Mission"[4] are identical PR releases, while fluff articles on BuzzFeed [5] and SheKnows[6] have the explicit disclaimer that the contributions are user-submitted without editorial oversight. Judging from the similar dates of most articles, a publicity push started in mid to late May. Wikipedia is not a place for promotion, and it is too soon for this person to warrant an encyclopedia article. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it's obviously self-promotional. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Michigan should remain in Wikipedia

These 2 links bear more reliability for this article.

1. http://www.tbs-alumni.com/gene/main.php?base=22&id_news=900&action=details

2. http://www.sheknows.com/community/health/french-model-david-michigan-teams-miss-tattoo-france-2017

Gendelafrog (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found this pretty funny, but it doesn't meet notability requirements. The Buzzfeed references are community content, not by Buzzfeed staff (who might count as reliable sources). As far as I can tell the refs are all self-published/"community"/advertorial/promotional content. A Google search found nothing better. The article is desperately promotional, which isn't always grounds for deletion, but there's no indication of coverage in good quality sources, and even with sourcing it would require heavy editing to be encyclopedic. Is there some kind of international body like the Nobel Prize Committee that adjudicates on "the best tattoo in the world"? --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notable

http://www.tbs-alumni.com/gene/main.php?base=22&id_news=900&action=details

https://indilens.com/298256-exclusive-interview-david-michigan-and-personal-trainer-profession/

http://www.valueyournetwork.com/decouvrez-notre-influenceur-de-la-semaine-le-blogueur-fitness-david-michigan/

http://lesreportersdunet.com/index.php/2017/06/12/premiere-edition-a-paris/

https://patch.com/new-york/portwashington/new-ways-improving-yourself

http://newsdog.today/a/article/59273ece12907144eb68b3f5/

@ Colapeninsula Above articles are saying exactly the opposite of what you have said here. Kalamya (talk) 11:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

huffingtonpost reports

Is not huffingtonpost a relaible source ?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-is-accountability-so-important-for-a-high-performance_us_594952bde4b09edb4c91f2ea

Kalamya (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a clear case of WP:PROMO with language such as: "...recognized as one of the top mental fitness trainer in the world as well as having one of the most aesthetic body!" etc, with a good dose of fringe in there. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.